c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel

Latest Updates: WOM in Entertainment RSS

  • And the Oscar goes to…

    Pat McCarthy 11:25 am on February 27, 2012 | 0 Comments Permalink | Post Your Comment!
    Tags: , , WOM in Entertainment

    Yesterday, the Oscars anointed a new class of timeless performances. Radian6 had crunched the numbers before the envelopes opened and found the social conversation to be fairly predictive of the final results.

    The data were gathered between Jan. 24 and Feb. 20, encompassing 332,422 social media conversations.

    Best Picture

    The Artist won the award, but didn’t win the conversation. The Help beat it out, 29,036 vs. 26,662 conversations.

    Actor in a Leading Role

    Jean Du Jardin narrowly beat Brad Pitt, 34,049 vs. 33,573 conversations. Du Jardin’s conversation was 94.7% positive as well, perhaps why he won.

    leading-role

    Actress in a Leading Role

    For The Iron Lady, Meryl Streep brought in her eighth Oscar and 32,963 social conversations.

    actress-leading-role

    Read more about the Oscar social conversation at Radian6

    Post to Twitter

     
  • The Oscars Predicted by Twitter and Facebook

    Pat McCarthy 11:10 am on February 24, 2012 | 2 Comments Permalink | Post Your Comment!
    Tags: , , , WOM in Entertainment

    Many regard social media to be the pulse of our society. Rightly, a slew of event outcomes can be predicted based on the chatter. However, one event cannot be predicted: The Oscars.

    The difference between The Oscars and, say, American Idol is that the former is controlled by a singular body of over 6,000 movie professionals and the latter is totally public. Even though a large percentage of the population doesn’t use Twitter, the conversation in it still shows general trends. So public contests can be predicted much better than private ones.

    This theory has been right in the past, but who knows, maybe this year will be different.

    Banyan Branch crunched the numbers and found the social conversation predicting…

    best-picture_banyan_branch

    best-actor_banyan_branch

    best-actress_banyan_branch

    See the full infographic at AllTwitter

    Post to Twitter

     
  • Which Ad Won the Super Bowl?

    Pat McCarthy 11:16 am on February 6, 2012 | 0 Comments Permalink | Post Your Comment!
    Tags: , , WOM in Entertainment

    The Giants won the game, but whose $3.5 million was best spent on 30 seconds? Radian6 very quickly created a summary report of the social conversation surrounding the game and ads.

    From their report:

    gameday-tweet-volume_radian6

    Tweet volume showed us how popular each ad was in the social world. The brand mention volume was:

    1. Doritos: 50,459

    2. H&M: 45,219

    3. Pepsi: 45,529

    4. Chevrolet: 40,739

    5. Chrysler: 34,934

    Compare that to Ad Age’s “Five we Loved” list:

    1. Kia: “A Dream Car. For Real Life.”

    2. Cars.com: “Neck”

    3. Chevy Sonic: “Stunt Anthem”

    4. Acura: “Transactions”

    5. Bud Light: “Rescue Dog

    A bit of a disparity there.

    What were your favorites? Or least favorites? Please comment.

    Read more about Super Bowl social data at Radian6 and Super Bowl ads at Ad Age

    Post to Twitter

     
  • The Fully Digital Super Bowl

    Pat McCarthy 11:47 am on February 3, 2012 | 0 Comments Permalink | Post Your Comment!
    Tags: , , WOM in Entertainment

    The Game

    Gone are the days when the TV got all the attention on Super Bowl Sunday. For the first time ever, the Super Bowl will be live streamed on NFL.com and NBCsports.com. There will be tons of content on the dedicated Facebook page, YouTube Channel, Twitter profile and Foursquare page. Suffice it to say, the sports side of the Super Bowl is digitally covered.

    The Ads

    Creating an out-of-this-world ad campaign can’t just be about TV commercials anymore. Back when TV started to usurp print and radio’s power, campaigns needed to work on all three media. The same has happened with social media. Expect to see ads that have calls to action for specific hashtags or Facebook pages/apps. Chevy took it one step further with their Chevy Game Time app. It’s a contest that challenges users to find clues in Chevy’s Super Bowl ads. Brilliant! People will happily and very closely watch Chevy’s ads to find the clues.

    (Insider’s tip: That’s a great way to make your $3.5 million 30-second spot worth it.)

    Read more about what brands are doing for Super Bowl Sunday at Likeable Media

    Post to Twitter

     
  • It’s Gonna be a Social Super Bowl

    Pat McCarthy 12:12 pm on February 1, 2012 | 0 Comments Permalink | Post Your Comment!
    Tags: , , WOM in Entertainment

    Social wonks can now join all the advertising wonks on Super Bowl Sunday. Heck, ESPN has a Social Media Command Center. This just got serious.

    Brands now have an excellent extended opportunity with the Super Bowl. No longer are all eyes on the 30-second spots. People will log into their social media accounts as they crack their first beer. So even if you can’t put up about $3.5 million, your brand can be part of the experience.

    The Conversation So Far

    Banyan Branch analyzed the social data arising from the teams and players during January. So far in the social Super Bowl, Tom Brady is most tweeted,

    tweets-per-player

    And the Patriots eclipsed the Giants in tweet volume.

    team-spirit

    Key Takeaway: The Giants are the conversation underdog. If they win the game, I’d be interested to see how that affects their social stats.

    Read more about the data at AdRants

    Post to Twitter

     
  • The NFL Players Association Changes the Conversation

    Pat McCarthy 9:50 am on November 18, 2011 | 0 Comments Permalink | Post Your Comment!
    Tags: , , , WOM in Entertainment

    Marketers know that words matter. What was initially known as a “Players Strike” became a “Players Lockout” and it was not by mistake or luck.

    George Atallah and Dominique Foxworth closed yesterday’s sessions with their Keynote on how NFL players changed the conversation around the lockout by mobilizing in social media.

    Football is big business. Billions of dollars are on the line with many vested parties. The owners, like any business people, want to maximize their profits. The media want the same. To do so, the media had to be favorable to the NFL lest they fall out of their good grace. That left the players in a weakened position. How were they to tell their side of the story without the traditional media’ cooperation?

    Many of the players had already set up social media accounts. Some were to connect with fans and some, as Dominique said, were just to find parties. The NFL Players Association found their medium. First, they strove to keep players accurately informed about the negotiations. Then they encouraged players to share their side of the story with the overlying theme “Let us play.”

    The narrative began to shift. Eventually, the fans caught on. Then the media couldn’t ignore it. In the end, the owners couldn’t either. The players’ story and community became their greatest bargaining chip, which led to a more fair deal.

    The strength of a community is unlimited given the right tools. Social media has unlocked the potential of the NFL players along with countless other disenfranchised communities. This isn’t limited to superstar athletes. The validity of a movement can now be judged by the power of its message instead of the size of its budget.

    Post to Twitter

     
  • #MLB League Championship Series by the Numbers

    Pat McCarthy 9:53 am on October 19, 2011 | 0 Comments Permalink | Post Your Comment!
    Tags: , , , WOM in Entertainment

    The World Series begins tonight. Sports fans are jazzed, but the marketer in you may be curious about how each team fared in the online share of voice. Visible Technologies found the answer.

    The Teams:

    It looks like the share of voice wasn’t very predictive of the winner, with the vanquished Detroit Tigers pulling the largest share (30.9%).

    league-series-team-sov

    The Players:

    Nelson Cruz dominated the conversation by racking up 6 home runs and 13 RBIs.

    league-series-players-bar2

    Key Takeaway: The Tigers, a perennial loser, and Cruz, an October all-star, got the attention. It may seem like a mixed message, but the conversations surrounded hope and amazement – two emotions any talkable brand should strive for.

    See more insights at Visibly Intelligent, Visible Technology’s blog

    Visible Technologies is a WOMMA member.

    Post to Twitter

     
  • Does Talkability Equal Value in Sports?

    Pat McCarthy 10:17 am on February 2, 2011 | 2 Comments Permalink | Post Your Comment!
    Tags: , WOM in Entertainment

    Our pal John Moore did a nice analysis of how word of mouth relates to the value of sports teams. He compared data from Keller Fay Group’s data to Forbes’ Most Valuable Sports Franchises report. The results were surprising.

    talkability-vs-profitability1

    Read his full analysis at Brand Autopsy


    Post to Twitter

     
  • Speaker Interview: The Artist’s Digital Web

    Pat McCarthy 9:32 am on November 5, 2010 | 0 Comments Permalink | Post Your Comment!
    Tags: , , , , WOM in Entertainment

    lee-hammond

    Lee Hammond is the Director of New Media at Interscope. He will present at WOMMA Summit 2010 about how Interscope has worked with Janrain to keep fans engaged with their favorite bands.

    Since your product is content, how do you decide what is the best balance between paid and free content to maximize ROI?

    We do a lot of events around artists like Lady Gaga, artists who don’t really need to give away product to develop market awareness. In that category, we create promotional content to create awareness of an upcoming tour or album. What I’m going to be speaking about at Summit is how we have been able to create highly social mini-events around surprisingly straightforward content. The example I’m thinking of is simply taking album covers and, rather than syndicate that out as we used to do, we’ll create an event where it is revealed on the website. In the eyes of fans an the artist, that’s a big deal.

    We used to go through traditional registration approach for things like this, which was nice because you captured information about those who were interested. But now with social logins, people can login without filling anything out and see that album cover. With the right authorization, we can update their status for them on Twitter or Facebook to drive their friends back to the site. We started doing this with just singles on the site before it goes to radio. But now we’ve come up with more things like artist photos and videos. Any of these things become micro marketing events that lead to the big marketing event, which is street date.

    How do you organize a band’s digital presence? Do all roads lead to their website or is it a series of digital embassies?

    The unique thing about the music business is that each artist comes with their own business in themselves. I’ve been doing this since the times when a band would only have a website before there was even MySpace. These days it’s hard to imagine a band showing up to without a MySpace, Facebook or Twitter page in place.

    Internally we see more value in being the hub at the website and messaging from there. It gives us more data points and control. But we also don’t want to interrupt a good conversation. If an artist is really active on Twitter, we encourage them continue to do that. We can syndicate their tweets on Facebook and their site.

    We want the artist to continue to have that good organic voice, even though that voice isn’t necessarily what closes the deal and drives sales. So we augment that with sales offers, street date links, and television appearances.

    Probably the biggest challenge with Twitter is that it still feels like a conversation between the artist and the fan. So we are trying to figure out how to insert sales messages in that without disturbing that conversation and sounding too sales heavy.

    All these landmarks are resources we need. Facebook, MySpace, Twitter and websites are critical to a band’s online presence. One of the things I like to illustrate for bands is that official artist websites are usually the top search results. So you might feel like you have a big social network on Facebook and Twitter, but there is also an anonymous social network of people who lean in, type your name into Google and show up at your homepage. In my experience, that is an equal number of impressions that you can capture compared to the social presence. For marketing people, that’s found impressions and very important.

    The pendulum swings from one platform to the other. For a while, it was all about MySpace, then it was Facebook, then Twitter. And now artist websites are making a comeback. I don’t think there is any set rulebook except for adjusting to how the environment is changing.

    ———————

    Summit 2010 is full of great speakers like Lee. Learn more and register here.

    Post to Twitter

     
  • The World Cup, 30 Orange Minidresses & 2 Arrests

    Pat McCarthy 8:51 am on June 17, 2010 | 0 Comments Permalink | Post Your Comment!
    Tags: , WOM in Entertainment

    Marketing is big at The World Cup, but apparently South Africa is no friend to “Ambush Marketing.” In fact, there are laws against it.

    Long story short, two women were arrested for organizing 30 other women in orange minidresses to promote the Dutch beer company Bavaria. The issue was that companies are not allowed to benefit from marketing at events without paying for it.

    The full story is at Yahoo! Sports

    Post to Twitter