c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel

Latest Updates: Microblogging RSS

  • 6 Brands Doing Twitter Right

    Pat McCarthy 10:14 am on January 12, 2011 | 0 Comments Permalink | Post Your Comment!
    Tags: , Microblogging, ,

    “We learn by example and by direct experience because there are real limits to the adequacy of verbal instruction” - Malcolm Gladwell, Blink, 2005

    I thought of the above quote when I saw the cited post. Here are a few examples of brands on Twitter to learn from:

    1. @Ford - @ScottMonty has more influence. Why? One of the reasons is that he is a real person who tweets genuine opinions. Humanizing Twitter accounts makes the tweeter more relatable for the consumer.

    2. @Zappos_Service - This 24/7 company has 24/7 Twitter support. Not necessary for all brands, but if you’re 24/7, take some hints.

    3. @VirginAmerica - If you go with a brand handle, don’t sound stale. Virgin America did a great job developing a “casual, cheeky and irreverent” voice. It fits their brands and goes over well with their customers.

    See the other 3 brands doing Twitter right at Mashable

    Post to Twitter

     
  • Customer Service Via Twitter

    Pat McCarthy 11:14 am on January 10, 2011 | 1 Comments Permalink | Post Your Comment!
    Tags: , Microblogging, ,

    Best Buy’s Twelpforce is an excellent example of how to do customer service with Twitter. It isn’t, however, perfect. The cited post highlights how simply connecting on Twitter isn’t enough. A customer complained in a tweet and was advised to call the customer support line. After an hour on hold, said customer went right back to Twitter armed with new frustrations.

    Then the right thing happened. A Twelpforcer personally addressed the customer’s problem. It was solved quickly.

    Key Takeaway: Call centers are reactive. Social customer service is proactive. Don’t proactively react. It doesn’t make sense.

    Read more about this social customer care at Tech Affect.

    Post to Twitter

     
  • Day 1 Summit Recap

    Pat McCarthy 9:34 am on November 18, 2010 | 0 Comments Permalink | Post Your Comment!
    Tags: , , , Microblogging, , ,

    We had a great first day at WOMMA Summit 2010. There were so many great takeaways coming through the Summit Buzzroom that we decided to show the conference through the Twitter lens…

    KEYNOTE | Josh Bernoff, SVP, Idea Development, Forrester Research

    bernoff-21

    bernoff-1


    Keynote - Facebook | Identity-Driven Web Paul Ollinger, RVP, Facebook

    facebook-1

    facebook-2

    Jamba Juice | Blending Online with Offline Word of Mouth

    jamba-juice-1

    jamba-juice-2


    Hewlett-Packard | Reaching the Savvy College Crowd through the Power of WOM


    hp-1hp-2


    TMZ | Using Consumer Generated Media as a Brand’s Advertising Vehicle

    tmz-1tmz-2

    Post to Twitter

     
  • Speaker Interview: The Artist’s Digital Web

    Pat McCarthy 9:32 am on November 5, 2010 | 0 Comments Permalink | Post Your Comment!
    Tags: Microblogging, , , ,

    lee-hammond

    Lee Hammond is the Director of New Media at Interscope. He will present at WOMMA Summit 2010 about how Interscope has worked with Janrain to keep fans engaged with their favorite bands.

    Since your product is content, how do you decide what is the best balance between paid and free content to maximize ROI?

    We do a lot of events around artists like Lady Gaga, artists who don’t really need to give away product to develop market awareness. In that category, we create promotional content to create awareness of an upcoming tour or album. What I’m going to be speaking about at Summit is how we have been able to create highly social mini-events around surprisingly straightforward content. The example I’m thinking of is simply taking album covers and, rather than syndicate that out as we used to do, we’ll create an event where it is revealed on the website. In the eyes of fans an the artist, that’s a big deal.

    We used to go through traditional registration approach for things like this, which was nice because you captured information about those who were interested. But now with social logins, people can login without filling anything out and see that album cover. With the right authorization, we can update their status for them on Twitter or Facebook to drive their friends back to the site. We started doing this with just singles on the site before it goes to radio. But now we’ve come up with more things like artist photos and videos. Any of these things become micro marketing events that lead to the big marketing event, which is street date.

    How do you organize a band’s digital presence? Do all roads lead to their website or is it a series of digital embassies?

    The unique thing about the music business is that each artist comes with their own business in themselves. I’ve been doing this since the times when a band would only have a website before there was even MySpace. These days it’s hard to imagine a band showing up to without a MySpace, Facebook or Twitter page in place.

    Internally we see more value in being the hub at the website and messaging from there. It gives us more data points and control. But we also don’t want to interrupt a good conversation. If an artist is really active on Twitter, we encourage them continue to do that. We can syndicate their tweets on Facebook and their site.

    We want the artist to continue to have that good organic voice, even though that voice isn’t necessarily what closes the deal and drives sales. So we augment that with sales offers, street date links, and television appearances.

    Probably the biggest challenge with Twitter is that it still feels like a conversation between the artist and the fan. So we are trying to figure out how to insert sales messages in that without disturbing that conversation and sounding too sales heavy.

    All these landmarks are resources we need. Facebook, MySpace, Twitter and websites are critical to a band’s online presence. One of the things I like to illustrate for bands is that official artist websites are usually the top search results. So you might feel like you have a big social network on Facebook and Twitter, but there is also an anonymous social network of people who lean in, type your name into Google and show up at your homepage. In my experience, that is an equal number of impressions that you can capture compared to the social presence. For marketing people, that’s found impressions and very important.

    The pendulum swings from one platform to the other. For a while, it was all about MySpace, then it was Facebook, then Twitter. And now artist websites are making a comeback. I don’t think there is any set rulebook except for adjusting to how the environment is changing.

    ———————

    Summit 2010 is full of great speakers like Lee. Learn more and register here.

    Post to Twitter

     
  • Interview with Rob Key, CEO/Founder of Converseon

    Pat McCarthy 10:23 am on October 11, 2010 | 0 Comments Permalink | Post Your Comment!
    Tags: , , , , Microblogging, ,

    rob-key-new

    Rob Key is CEO/Founder of Converseon. He was the former head of the Innovations Group at a division of Young & Rubicam and member of the WPP.com board. Rob founded Converseon in 2001. It is a full service strategic social consultancy that provides the listening, organizational design and activation services to help large brands harness the value of social media across the enterprise.

    Listening is developing very quickly. Where do you see it going in the next few years?

    We see growth in social intelligence. We’re actually trying to have the industry try to deliniate between conversation monitoring and conversation mining, which we think are different animals. Conversation monitoring is simply monitoring for key words that show what people are saying about you right now. Mining and social intelligence are putting people into the data to help answer key fundamental business questions that simple monitoring solutions can’t provide.

    We’ve seen many companies over this past year who were doing the basic monitoring are now asking themselves a few basic questions:

    - How do I take this intelligence to actually move my business to meet objectives?

    - How do we infuse this across the organization so that it can be acted on?

    - How do we organize our brand around the social intelligence?

    What we are finding is that as the social people and social intelligence are flowing through the organization, companies are really recognizing that they aren’t organized to react quickly enough to the data to make an impact. So social intelligence is rapidly morphing into business process redesign.

    At Converseon, the way we’ve handled this is by building a management consulting firm, led by Chris Boudreaux formerly of Accenture, to create overarching frameworks within organizations to help social intelligence and media have a single uniform systematic approach that cuts across the organization. This affects things like governance, policy and training. We were recently were noted by Forrester as a leader in the Social Listening category in the Forrester Wave.

    So we’ve actually found social intelligence as a foundation for us. We’re now competing in business transfomation with companies like McKinsey who has a partnership with Nielsen, for example, and other more traditional management consultants. That is a significant part of our business going forward because that is the only way, at the end of the day, that social intelligence can really boom a business, by helping to transform businesses from the inside out to organize around this intelligence.

    What would you say is the mindset a brand needs to harbor before they can effectively utilize social intelligence?

    They have to first understand that conversation mining and social intelligence can actually impact business outcomes, things that keep the C-suite up at night. Things like product development, R&D, improving services, customer care, and compliance. It doesn’t come naturally for some senior executives to understand that this thing called social intelligence and social media can help meet those business goals that are KPIs that govern the entire business.

    So the first place we start with is understanding what a business is trying to achieve. Everybody has KPIs within the organization. For example, customer care might measure performance by first call resolution or reduction in call center costs. Once we understand what the business is trying to achieve, we then configure the social intelligence and metrics backwards to fulfill those business objectives.

    There isn’t a lot of recognition that the power of social media and inteligence can drive ongoing sustainable competitive advantage in the market. What often happens is companies have the mindset that they have to do ‘this listening/monitoring thing.’ This is really just Listening 1.0. You know, just turning on the dashboard and looking at the general conversation that people are having about us. To me, that was good for the time but now you need to mature that to the next level. These are the deeper business conversations that are starting to happen.

    The mindset needs to be: How do we get serious about this?; How do we actually infuse this into the enterprise?; and How do we drive a real business value? A surprising large number of companies are coming to that recognition. We’re seeing that happen across the board in pharma, financial services, CPG, B2B, everywhere. The first generation is over, been there done that. Now the second generation is much more interesting, more profound, and more powerful.

    You mentioned pharma. How do you think brands in their situation, being a highly regulated industry, fit into listening and word of mouth marketing?

    I think everybody is sitting at the edge of their seats for the FDA to come out with more guidelines around all of this, but I don’t think the FDA will come out with that level of clarity for them. What we do know is that there are things that are pretty safe for pharma to do around issues as opposed to talking product.

    On the listening side, one of the key areas is adverse impact reporting and knowing what that means within the company. How is that handled in an effective way within internal structures and policies. That’s an area where we spend a lot of time working with our clients to help make sure they’re protected and have complete guidelines around this. But also, pharma and financial services are starting to use conversation mining and social intelligence from a compliance standpoint.

    Converseon is proud to be the only vendor in the Forrester Wave that has full Twitter fire hose access. We were able to negotiate that partnership about a month ago. This data has become incredibly important with 160 million users and Twitter being the heartbeat of the social conversation. Most people don’t realize that through the regular APIs, they’re getting between 5 and 10 percent, maybe 20 percent on a good day of the overall Twitter conversation. We have 100 percent. That’s critical for regulated industries to understand compliance about how they can ensure employees are keeping within the bounds of policy and regulation. This is absolutely essential from an insurance, pharma and financial services standpoint.

    On our blog, we recently published an article that spells all this out in much finer detail about why Twitter fire hose is essential in regulated environments.

    ——————————————

    Did you know Exclusive Interviews are a governing member benefit? Contact Tarah@WOMMA.org to discuss this and the many other benefits of governing membership.

    Post to Twitter

     
  • What’s in a @Name?

    Pat McCarthy 9:39 am on October 1, 2010 | 0 Comments Permalink | Post Your Comment!
    Tags: , , Microblogging, ,

    Followers don’t equal influence.
    - Brian Solis

    There are many tweeters out there with a lot of followers, but little influence. Brands that really want to identify and engage influencers on Twitter need to recognize the growing importance of Nicheworks.

    Nichework - n. - A network centered around a very specific topic.

    A captive audience is hard to build. Despite this, many have done it. Nicheworks exist and are far more valuable to brands than large networks that resemble broadcast channels.

    Key Takeaway: No matter what your industry, there are nicheworks associated. Find them and get into the conversation. (Warning: don’t sell into the conversation.)

    Read more about Nicheworks and Influence at Fast Company and Brian Solis’ blog

    Post to Twitter

     
  • #NewTwitter, Better than New Coke

    Pat McCarthy 10:40 am on September 29, 2010 | 0 Comments Permalink | Post Your Comment!
    Tags: Microblogging,

    A good old fashioned update to a simple accepted product can go either good or bad. But by many account, new Twitter is pretty clever. However, you might want to update your Twitter background. 1000heads, our pals across the pond, offered a few suggested edits:

    EDIT 1:

    If you want to create your own, then we recommend graphic that has a 20pixel gap at the top and a 48pixel width for the side. We’d also recommend, for now at least, that you create something that works on both #newtwitter and old.

    EDIT 2:

    If you’ve updated your background because of this post, then please do leave a comment with a link. We’d love to know who’s not only benefited from this blog but also - more importantly - exactly how creative our readers can get with such limited space!

    Read all of 1000heads’ suggestions here at their blog.

    Post to Twitter

     
  • Study: Influence isn’t in Follower Numbers

    Pat McCarthy 10:39 am on September 29, 2010 | 0 Comments Permalink | Post Your Comment!
    Tags: , Microblogging, ,

    Celebrity twitter users with astronomical follower numbers are not that influential. This might come as surprise when you see that Justin Bieber alone accounts for 3% of Twitter’s servers.

    But scientists at Northwestern University used mathematical algorithms to rank the most influential people based on how individuals shaped trending topics. In the end, context was key. People with sway in certain categories drove those conversations.

    Key Takeaway: Influence is in expertise, not celebrity. Don’t be fooled by high follower numbers. Look closer at retweets and trend setters.

    Read more about where influence really sits at eConsultancy

    Post to Twitter

     
  • Disaster Response Adopts Social Media

    Pat McCarthy 8:48 am on September 24, 2010 | 0 Comments Permalink | Post Your Comment!
    Tags: Microblogging,

    Social networks have proven to become valuable resources after disasters. You can look at Haiti as an example. The standard communication channels were down, but Twitter became alive with first hand updates and pleas for help. This was the impetus for a project called Exercise24, which today will simulate a disaster in hopes of learning how to effectively track buzz and integrate it with emergency response.

    To participate, you can read the guidelines here. All tweets and posts will be labeled with “Test. Not real.”

    More about the test and how to participate at the Charlotte Observer

    Post to Twitter

     
  • How is Your Content Shared?

    Pat McCarthy 10:15 am on September 15, 2010 | 0 Comments Permalink | Post Your Comment!
    Tags: , , , Microblogging

    Let’s talk tracking. Brands need to know not only what messages are working but also who they are working on. Knowing your the folks who really spread a message is key to building an influencer engagement program. So how do you find them? There are several options:

    1. Klout - Measures the categorical influence of Twitter users, valuable for knowing who is influential in different areas.

    2. Bit.ly - Measures where your traffic came from…except when links are altered by other social services.

    3. ShareThis - Offers multiple reports that measure shareablility, light on influencer finding though.

    Read more at InfiniGraph

    Post to Twitter